So . . . you don't care about people owning slaves?GrumpyCatFace wrote:....therefore the Trail of Tears was justified? Man, you are batting .000 today.DBTrek wrote:And they owned slaves.
But we don't talk about that part.
The short period when big scale historical movies were cool
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: The short period when big scale historical movies were cool
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 25408
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: The short period when big scale historical movies were cool
I don't justify great wrongs based on my opinion of the victim.DBTrek wrote:So . . . you don't care about people owning slaves?GrumpyCatFace wrote:....therefore the Trail of Tears was justified? Man, you are batting .000 today.DBTrek wrote:And they owned slaves.
But we don't talk about that part.
Suppose you found some 1920's statistics showing that German Jews were more prone to criminal activity than the other ethnic groups. Justified holocaust?
This is why I don't support "glassing the Middle East", or provoking some kind of idiotic war with Islam. Their outrageous actions don't justify an outrageous response.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: The short period when big scale historical movies were cool
So . . . no. You don't care the the Cherokee owned human beings and treated them like animals.
Mainly because the Cherokee weren't white.
I got it.
Thanks.
Mainly because the Cherokee weren't white.
I got it.
Thanks.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 25408
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: The short period when big scale historical movies were cool
Or that. Yes, if I were to see a Cherokee slaving operation in my lifetime, I would oppose it.DBTrek wrote:So . . . no. You don't care the the Cherokee owned human beings and treated them like animals.
Mainly because the Cherokee weren't white.
I got it.
Thanks.
Mind wiping off my chessboard before you go?
-
- Posts: 5991
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am
Re: The short period when big scale historical movies were cool
Okay, but what is your stance on really long hikes?GrumpyCatFace wrote:Or that. Yes, if I were to see a Cherokee slaving operation in my lifetime, I would oppose it.DBTrek wrote:So . . . no. You don't care the the Cherokee owned human beings and treated them like animals.
Mainly because the Cherokee weren't white.
I got it.
Thanks.
Mind wiping off my chessboard before you go?
HAIL!
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen
-
- Posts: 25408
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: The short period when big scale historical movies were cool
Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:Okay, but what is your stance on really long hikes?GrumpyCatFace wrote:Or that. Yes, if I were to see a Cherokee slaving operation in my lifetime, I would oppose it.DBTrek wrote:So . . . no. You don't care the the Cherokee owned human beings and treated them like animals.
Mainly because the Cherokee weren't white.
I got it.
Thanks.
Mind wiping off my chessboard before you go?

-
- Posts: 28382
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: The short period when big scale historical movies were cool
No, don't go there, that's a separate issue.GrumpyCatFace wrote:....therefore the Trail of Tears was justified? Man, you are batting .000 today.DBTrek wrote:And they owned slaves.
But we don't talk about that part.
Native Americans should have to answer for their own inhumanity, instead of bypassing it to blame whitey
PLATA O PLOMO

Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: The short period when big scale historical movies were cool
I didn't even mention the Trail of Tears.C-Mag wrote:No, don't go there, that's a separate issue.GrumpyCatFace wrote:....therefore the Trail of Tears was justified? Man, you are batting .000 today.DBTrek wrote:And they owned slaves.
But we don't talk about that part.
Native Americans should have to answer for their own inhumanity, instead of bypassing it to blame whitey
I just said the Cherokees owned slaves and it triggered GCF into instantly accusing me of being Andrew Jackson.

"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 28382
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: The short period when big scale historical movies were cool
DBTrek wrote:I didn't even mention the Trail of Tears.C-Mag wrote:No, don't go there, that's a separate issue.GrumpyCatFace wrote:
....therefore the Trail of Tears was justified? Man, you are batting .000 today.
Native Americans should have to answer for their own inhumanity, instead of bypassing it to blame whitey
I just said the Cherokees owned slaves and it triggered GCF into instantly accusing me of being Andrew Jackson.
Well, you kind of are like Andy J....... But that doesn't apply here.
Standard Libtard debate rules to put you on the defensive and get you talking about how Whitey did some shit wrong to some brown person.
PLATA O PLOMO

Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 18791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: The short period when big scale historical movies were cool
I particularly liked the ending.........GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Also, Braveheart is an awesome movie. Don't try to learn history from a movie.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.

