Castle review thread.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Castle review thread.

Post by Montegriffo »

OK, be a soulless old fuddy-duddy then Carlus. ;)
As far as I know, the final design hasn't been settled on but the appointed architecture is a traditionalist who has said ''traditional or I walk'' but Macron and the guy he put in overall command of the restoration are more open to innovation.
Farmer Paul reckons they should leave it as it is and build a small church inside the ruins. It's not like the current congregation is big enough to fill a cathedral anymore.
I quite like that option too as it tells the history of the building rather than trying to hide it behind a cloned restoration.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
Xenophon
Posts: 2713
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am

Re: Castle review thread.

Post by Xenophon »

Art Deco is better.
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Castle review thread.

Post by Montegriffo »

Architectural reactionaries.
We'd all still be living in caves and mud huts if everyone thought like you lot.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
Hastur
Posts: 5297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: suiþiuþu

Re: Castle review thread.

Post by Hastur »

Xenophon wrote: Thu Feb 27, 2020 12:20 pm Art Deco is better.
Yes. It embraced the best of its time, was modern in the sense that it looked completely new. But it wasn't "modernist". It didn't reject all previous ideas of aesthetics and tradition. It acknowledged the beauty in nature and myth.
Image

An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna

Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck
User avatar
Hastur
Posts: 5297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: suiþiuþu

Re: Castle review thread.

Post by Hastur »

I was thinking more of Art Nouveau there but it paved the way for Art Deco, so I tend to lump them together. The last of the beautiful styles. Before Bauhaus opened the door for the Brutalists that destroyed so much of European beauty after WWII.
Image

An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna

Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck
User avatar
Xenophon
Posts: 2713
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am

Re: Castle review thread.

Post by Xenophon »

Hastur wrote: Fri Feb 28, 2020 2:57 am I was thinking more of Art Nouveau there but it paved the way for Art Deco, so I tend to lump them together. The last of the beautiful styles. Before Bauhaus opened the door for the Brutalists that destroyed so much of European beauty after WWII.
Brutalism is garbage.
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Castle review thread.

Post by Montegriffo »

The thing I've never understood about the concrete monstrosities of brutalist architecture is the lack of colour. I understand the need to rebuild quickly and cheaply after the war but why everything was left in a dreary grey finish escapes me. Surely the cost of painting these buildings was not the deciding factor.
That said, it is not completely without merit. With a bit of imagination, along with the versitility of the materials it was possible to design some stunning and innovative buildings. All of which would have been improved by the addition of colour IMO.
Image

Image

Image

Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Castle review thread.

Post by Montegriffo »

For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28382
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Castle review thread.

Post by C-Mag »

It's a year later and France still has no cause for th he Notre Dame fire.

What's up?

The reactionary original OFFICIAL cause of bad wiring has bern proven completely false. As it turns out all the electrical met stringent codes.

Why was this lie made official so early on ?
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Castle review thread.

Post by Montegriffo »

C-Mag wrote: Sat Apr 18, 2020 11:37 am It's a year later and France still has no cause for th he Notre Dame fire.

What's up?

The reactionary original OFFICIAL cause of bad wiring has bern proven completely false. As it turns out all the electrical met stringent codes.

Why was this lie made official so early on ?
It wasn't a lie it was the best theory at the time. There has since been evidence that it could have been workers on the scaffolding disobeying the smoking ban.
The alarm systems were woefully inadequate too as they alerted people to a fire starting with smoke detectors but didn't pinpoint the origin of the fire.
Lessons learned the hard way.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image