
Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
-
- Posts: 18794
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz

For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.


-
- Posts: 4653
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
-
- Posts: 25417
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
What's the meme here?
-
- Posts: 18794
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz

For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.


-
- Posts: 4197
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:48 am
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
Missing from that meme is the carbon market that they want to create. No mention of money (read: power), seriously? I thought we were all adults here.
-
- Posts: 18794
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
Who is ''they''?
A carbon tax is probably the most effective way of reducing CO2 output.
Carbon markets are just a greenwash. Rich countries buying the allowance of poor countries so that emissions stay the same.
A carbon tax is probably the most effective way of reducing CO2 output.
Carbon markets are just a greenwash. Rich countries buying the allowance of poor countries so that emissions stay the same.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.


-
- Posts: 4197
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:48 am
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
Huh? Carbon tax is carbon market. Again, there ain't no shanghai la. If there is a tax then there is going to be a credit. Built in exploits are a given. Anyway, I have yet to see definitive proof that carbon is the actual problem.Montegriffo wrote: Fri Jan 10, 2020 10:25 pm Who is ''they''?
A carbon tax is probably the most effective way of reducing CO2 output.
Carbon markets are just a greenwash. Rich countries buying the allowance of poor countries so that emissions stay the same.
Meme was shit, any way it is dissected.
-
- Posts: 18794
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
A tax is just that. A tax. A charge on carbon emissions. There is no need to create a market to offset it.Haumana wrote: Fri Jan 10, 2020 10:31 pmHuh? Carbon tax is carbon market. Again, there ain't no shanghai la. If there is a tax then there is going to be a credit. Built in exploits are a given. Anyway, I have yet to see definitive proof that carbon is the actual problem.Montegriffo wrote: Fri Jan 10, 2020 10:25 pm Who is ''they''?
A carbon tax is probably the most effective way of reducing CO2 output.
Carbon markets are just a greenwash. Rich countries buying the allowance of poor countries so that emissions stay the same.
Meme was shit, any way it is dissected.
The consumer ends up paying and companies are incentivized to cut emissions so they can undercut their competitors.
I don't even care where the money raised goes so long as it doesn't result in more emissions. The point is to incentivize industry and consumers to reduce their footprints.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.


-
- Posts: 4197
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:48 am
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
Name one tax that doesn't have an offset credit, or an exception, attached to it in American tax law.Montegriffo wrote: Fri Jan 10, 2020 10:39 pmA tax is just that. A tax. A charge on carbon emissions. There is no need to create a market to offset it.Haumana wrote: Fri Jan 10, 2020 10:31 pmHuh? Carbon tax is carbon market. Again, there ain't no shanghai la. If there is a tax then there is going to be a credit. Built in exploits are a given. Anyway, I have yet to see definitive proof that carbon is the actual problem.Montegriffo wrote: Fri Jan 10, 2020 10:25 pm Who is ''they''?
A carbon tax is probably the most effective way of reducing CO2 output.
Carbon markets are just a greenwash. Rich countries buying the allowance of poor countries so that emissions stay the same.
Meme was shit, any way it is dissected.
The consumer ends up paying and companies are incentivized to cut emissions so they can undercut their competitors.
I don't even care where the money raised goes so long as it doesn't result in more emissions. The point is to incentivize industry and consumers to reduce their footprints.
That you don't even care about where the money goes is telling. Ain't nobody reducing nothing that doesn't get passed on down to you and I, aka the consumers. Self flagellation, ftw!