How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18852
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by Montegriffo »

Fife wrote: Wed Jul 31, 2019 3:25 pm
Montegriffo wrote: Wed Jul 31, 2019 2:57 pm A lot of effort going into discrediting Mueller.
Page after page in the RW media.
You could almost call it a conspiracy.
Mueller is the real victim in this whole mess.

:goteam: :drunk:
Truth is the real victim.
Death, death, to the IDF.

Image
User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by Fife »

Montegriffo wrote: Wed Jul 31, 2019 3:28 pm
Fife wrote: Wed Jul 31, 2019 3:25 pm
Montegriffo wrote: Wed Jul 31, 2019 2:57 pm A lot of effort going into discrediting Mueller.
Page after page in the RW media.
You could almost call it a conspiracy.
Mueller is the real victim in this whole mess.

:goteam: :drunk:
Truth is the real victim.
You could almost call it a conspiracy.
User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28399
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by C-Mag »

ooky wrote: Thu Jun 07, 2018 5:25 pm
Fife wrote: Wed Jul 31, 2019 3:25 pm
Mueller is the real victim in this whole mess.

:goteam: :drunk:
I am completely flummoxed when I come here and 1) see very, very little about any new developments that are crazy serious, and 2) what comments there are just seem to completely dismiss the entire idea as so stupid no discussion is needed.

Shame on you Fife, making light of this serious, serious investigation. :twisted:
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25488
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by SuburbanFarmer »

C-Mag wrote: Wed Jul 31, 2019 3:13 pm
Ph64 wrote: Wed Jul 31, 2019 2:59 pm
The only question that remains, and the only possible shred of truth to the “No Collusion” tweets, is that we don’t yet know if Trump directly contacted Russians himself, or if he just knew it was going on and did nothing to stop it or change elements of his campaign that were seeking to further this.
Isn't there a 3rd option missing there? As in:
"Trump didn't directly contact the Russians, and didn't know it was going on (if it even was)"?

Isn't that what "no collusion" means? Interesting bias that you would leave that option out. :think:

Also interesting that your obvious bias there implies "guilty, no proof of it though yet"...


Which is it ?
Is Trump an evil mastermind who's been under investigation for the last 3 years and is so diabolically, genius and stable that he's fooled the best and brightest in the FBI, or...…………………..

Is Trump a bumbling fool, sloppy con man criminal ? As he's painted by the media. Both can't be true.


There is a 3rd option, he may be the cleanest President in modern history.
‘Best and brightest in the FBI’. :lol:
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0
User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28399
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by C-Mag »

The media and lefties paint Trump and his voters as backwards fools that can barely read...………….. but then imply Trump is a criminal mastermind when it comes to Russia :lol: :lol: :lol:


Fuck, I love NPC's but they get fucking annoying after a while.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28399
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: How is the Russia Investigation not Serious

Post by C-Mag »

ooky wrote: Thu Jun 07, 2018 5:25 pm Lay out your arguments for me. I am completely flummoxed when I come here and 1) see very, very little about any new developments that are crazy serious, and 2) what comments there are just seem to completely dismiss the entire idea as so stupid no discussion is needed.

Here is what I see hard evidence for that has not been successfully contradicted by the Trump administration. Sure, they have screamed “13 angry Democrats” (also not true), “witch hunt”, “no collusion”, while giving no evidence for their positions at all, just catch phrases and blanket “there’s nothing here” statements. In point of fact, over time we’ve learned again and again that things that were categorically denied by the administration turned out to be true, and we are only given explanations like “it’s not a crime to lie to the press”.

1. In 2016, Putin’s regime mounted information warfare against the United States. Their aim was to disrupt the election and get Trump elected. The CIA determined this as fact in Dec 2016. This conclusion has only had more evidence to support it since then, to the point we now know which Facebook memes were from Russian accounts, that they targeted battleground states, and Homeland Security testified to the Senate in June 2017 that Russian hackers targeted voting systems in 21 states.
a. Yes, US and others do this and worse to other countries. That doesn’t make it right. I consider it a terrible stain on our country that we do this. That argument does not clear Trump.
2. While this direct attack on our democracy was underway, Trump campaign was covertly trying to collude with Russia – sending Papodopolous, and it is highly likely that Manafort was reaching out through his connections as well. We do know Manafort was who you should have as campaign manager if you DID want to have a secret direct connection to Russia, as he’s been paid at least $12.7 MM in illegal cash from the pro-Russian Ukranian president Victor Yanukovych and has worked as an advisor to him and others for over 10 years. Manafort is currently under formal indictment for conspiracy against the US.
3. We know for a fact that when the Russian government explicitly offered them help, they jumped at the chance, and have lied about it ever since last summer, omitting this from forms, first saying it was about adoption, then admitting they were interested in Russian dirt on Clinton. Now the only thing they haven’t formally admitted, though Guiliani did, is whether Trump knew about it. And right after Don Jr got the info that there was Russian dirt, the Trump campaign was making announcements that they had big news to share on Clinton.
4. The Trump campaign repeatedly gaslit America in 2016 and said none of this was happening, providing cover for the Russian activities while they were happening.
5. The Trump campaign aligned itself against foreign nationals and assisted a foreign adversary for their own gain. This is illegal and a basic betrayal of our country.

The only question that remains, and the only possible shred of truth to the “No Collusion” tweets, is that we don’t yet know if Trump directly contacted Russians himself, or if he just knew it was going on and did nothing to stop it or change elements of his campaign that were seeking to further this.

It is not a witch hunt when an investigation secures 17 criminal indictments and already 5 guilty pleas. Number of indictments or guilty pleas for Benghazi or emails? 0 and 0, and those investigations lasted longer than this one already.
Bump
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience