Was she convicted of intimidating witnesses and defendants during an ongoing
trial and contempt of court?
Contempt of court and distributing literature and ideas in dissent of the totalitarian police state.
There were plenty of lemmings like you who quipped "but she broke the law!!"
Did she intimidate witnesses and defendants during an ongoing trial?
Yaxley Lennon's actions nearly resulted in the collapse of the trial.
The judge trying the case said that if "Tommy" had been allowed to continue intimidating the witnesses and defendants he would have had no choice but to abandon the trial.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Covering a story is called journalism, Monty. You sound like the Nazi supporters that justified the totalitarian persecution of Sophie Scholl.
Ever since I was a child and was confronted with the question of how people could allow this kind of totalitarianism to take root and spread, I thought about it quite a lot. I have gone through several iterations of explanations over the years, but I think I understand it now. As we see here, people will not even allow themselves to see it.
Monty, the only real difference between you and a Nazi supporter are a few minor tweaks of the ideology. You really only differ with them in your inversion of their core value of the white race, and you obviously do not disagree with their totalitarianism.
You will just quip that the victims "broke the law", but your targets really only dissented from your totalitarian ideology. That's why you celebrate their persecution.
And just inverting the fourteen words to "end whiteness" while utilizing the totalitarianism, police state apparatus, scape goating, and collective abuse of the target demographic does not really much distinguish you from other Nazis.
I mean.. was the only thing evil about Nazis that they protected the white German race to the detriment of nonwhites, and all they had to do was hate the white race but keep the totalitarianism and persecutions (just directed instead at whites)?
Being a citizen journalist, or whatever euphemism he wants to use, does not exempt Yaxley Lennon from the laws on contempt of court.
His actions jeopardised the trial of around 30 men accused of sexual offences.
He also breached the temporary reporting restrictions which were in place to ensure a fair trial of the accused men.
The bigoted prick and his foreign (Zionist) paymasters were prepared to risk the justice of these men's victims for self gain.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Montegriffo wrote: Thu Jul 11, 2019 8:33 pm
Being a citizen journalist, or whatever euphemism he wants to use, does not exempt Yaxley Lennon from the laws on contempt of court.
His actions jeopardised the trial of around 30 men accused of sexual offences.
He also breached the temporary reporting restrictions which were in place to ensure a fair trial of the accused men.
The bigoted prick and his foreign (Zionist) paymasters were prepared to risk the justice of these men's victims for self gain.
It's really amazing how you invert your anti-white bigotry and project it onto your victims. Truly.
Montegriffo wrote: Thu Jul 11, 2019 8:33 pm
Being a citizen journalist, or whatever euphemism he wants to use, does not exempt Yaxley Lennon from the laws on contempt of court.
His actions jeopardised the trial of around 30 men accused of sexual offences.
He also breached the temporary reporting restrictions which were in place to ensure a fair trial of the accused men.
The bigoted prick and his foreign (Zionist) paymasters were prepared to risk the justice of these men's victims for self gain.
Fair trial? Really? One groomed slaves... and he's free? That's fair? Bull-fucking-shit!
