Speaker to Animals wrote: Fri Jun 08, 2018 10:48 am
I am not going to bother reading the whole thing until you actually respond to what I wrote, dude.
In this context, the people I am talking about are the Swedish people. At what point do you suppose the Swedish people who are slated for near extermination in only a handful of generations have a justification for fighting back against the Swedes who convinced themselves of this cause?
The answer to your question: "At what point do you suppose we are justified in fighting back?" starts at the fourth line of my post. Begins with: "As for your..." and goes on till the end.
The answer to your previous question of wether Swedes was at the point where lethal force was warranted against political opponents was: "No". The explanation for that reply followed that "No".
Speaker to Animals wrote: Fri Jun 08, 2018 10:48 am
I am not going to bother reading the whole thing until you actually respond to what I wrote, dude.
In this context, the people I am talking about are the Swedish people. At what point do you suppose the Swedish people who are slated for near extermination in only a handful of generations have a justification for fighting back against the Swedes who convinced themselves of this cause?
The answer to your question: "At what point do you suppose we are justified in fighting back?" starts at the fourth line of my post. Begins with: "As for your..." and goes on till the end.
The answer to your previous question of wether Swedes was at the point where lethal force was warranted against political opponents was: "No". The explanation for that reply followed that "No".
So, I did respond to what you wrote.
You didn't respond. You launched into a tirade and a straw man about "my people" and I just stopped reading right there.
Again:
If 60% of Danes decided that Danes as a people deserve to be extinguished in a soft genocide, then are the 40% of Danes who don't want their people and culture to perish supposed to just let it happen?
Speaker to Animals wrote: Fri Jun 08, 2018 10:48 am
I am not going to bother reading the whole thing until you actually respond to what I wrote, dude.
In this context, the people I am talking about are the Swedish people. At what point do you suppose the Swedish people who are slated for near extermination in only a handful of generations have a justification for fighting back against the Swedes who convinced themselves of this cause?
The answer to your question: "At what point do you suppose we are justified in fighting back?" starts at the fourth line of my post. Begins with: "As for your..." and goes on till the end.
The answer to your previous question of wether Swedes was at the point where lethal force was warranted against political opponents was: "No". The explanation for that reply followed that "No".
So, I did respond to what you wrote.
You didn't respond. You launched into a tirade and a straw man about "my people" and I just stopped reading right there.
Again:
If 60% of Danes decided that Danes as a people deserve to be extinguished in a soft genocide, then are the 40% of Danes who don't want their people and culture to perish supposed to just let it happen?
Serious question. Try answering it.
No, the 40% are not suppoed to just let it happen.
Counterquestion, then: Are 60%, or any significant percentage of Swedes, engaging in a soft genocide of Swedes or are/were you just asking general questions about things not happening in the real world?
The answer to your question: "At what point do you suppose we are justified in fighting back?" starts at the fourth line of my post. Begins with: "As for your..." and goes on till the end.
The answer to your previous question of wether Swedes was at the point where lethal force was warranted against political opponents was: "No". The explanation for that reply followed that "No".
So, I did respond to what you wrote.
You didn't respond. You launched into a tirade and a straw man about "my people" and I just stopped reading right there.
Again:
If 60% of Danes decided that Danes as a people deserve to be extinguished in a soft genocide, then are the 40% of Danes who don't want their people and culture to perish supposed to just let it happen?
Serious question. Try answering it.
No, the 40% are not suppoed to just let it happen.
Counterquestion, then: Are 60%, or any significant percentage of Swedes, engaging in a soft genocide of Swedes or are/were you just asking general questions about things not happening in the real world?
I honestly don't know what percentage of Swedes actually support the genocide of the Swedish people. It seems like more than 60%, but I don't know for sure.
The mentality and ideology behind it, however, is prevalent across the Western world. It's only a matter of degree. If these people ever get enough power to do it in your country, you better bet your pastry-loving Danish ass they will set about the destruction of the Danish people to create what they believe is a one-world utopia of cappuccino people.
Leftists - We value diversity more than anyone else, which is why we won’t relent with anti-Western policies until the entire world is a uniform light-brown.
Nothing is as diverse as everyone looking and believing the same, eh?
The white left across the western world are to some degree hell-bent on genociding their fellow whites. In Sweden, they have gone so far as to reasonably achieve a genocide of the Swedish people within a few generations.
The Muslims really need to go home. That's a separate issue. I am talking about divisions within our own people in which one group has decided it would be a great idea to exterminate us all in a soft genocide.
At what point do you suppose we are justified in fighting back?
The white left across the western world are to some degree hell-bent on genociding their fellow whites. In Sweden, they have gone so far as to reasonably achieve a genocide of the Swedish people within a few generations.
The Muslims really need to go home. That's a separate issue. I am talking about divisions within our own people in which one group has decided it would be a great idea to exterminate us all in a soft genocide.
At what point do you suppose we are justified in fighting back?
The white left across the western world are to some degree hell-bent on genociding their fellow whites. In Sweden, they have gone so far as to reasonably achieve a genocide of the Swedish people within a few generations.
The Muslims really need to go home. That's a separate issue. I am talking about divisions within our own people in which one group has decided it would be a great idea to exterminate us all in a soft genocide.
At what point do you suppose we are justified in fighting back?
Fever dreams....
That's what you and your commie buddies said about the holocaust too.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.