What Is More to Blame (Looking Back)

User avatar
GloryofGreece
Posts: 3007
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 8:29 am

Re: What Is More to Blame (Looking Back)

Post by GloryofGreece »

Longue durée is a cool word. didn't know until the podcast, :dance:
The good, the true, & the beautiful
User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: What Is More to Blame (Looking Back)

Post by Fife »

GloryofGreece wrote:Sorry I don't automatically know your thought pattern. With a little cursory research I found out that the podcast you linked is an author that likes to write about how people screwed up America. The 30 minute podcast episode was interesting though. Thought provoking. I'm guessing he wanted the Confederation to stay over a Federalist form of government?
I haven't been listening to McClanahan all that long, and I bought the Hamilton book but haven't been able to read it yet; so I'm no expert on his opinions yet. But I would hazard a guess that he if more of a fan of George Mason, Thomas Jefferson, Sam Adams, Luther Martin, &c, than of Hamilton, John Marshall, &c.
User avatar
GloryofGreece
Posts: 3007
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2017 8:29 am

Re: What Is More to Blame (Looking Back)

Post by GloryofGreece »

Fife wrote:
GloryofGreece wrote:Sorry I don't automatically know your thought pattern. With a little cursory research I found out that the podcast you linked is an author that likes to write about how people screwed up America. The 30 minute podcast episode was interesting though. Thought provoking. I'm guessing he wanted the Confederation to stay over a Federalist form of government?
I haven't been listening to McClanahan all that long, and I bought the Hamilton book but haven't been able to read it yet; so I'm no expert on his opinions yet. But I would hazard a guess that he if more of a fan of George Mason, Thomas Jefferson, Sam Adams, Luther Martin, &c, than of Hamilton, John Marshall, &c.
I'm digging his thoughts on his podcast. I listened to one on Trump from a year ago and now listening to "Should we be fearful". But the one you linked was cool...id like to hear him more on historical topics than straight modern politics.
The good, the true, & the beautiful
heydaralon
Posts: 7571
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm

Re: What Is More to Blame (Looking Back)

Post by heydaralon »

King George III wasn't so bad either.
Shikata ga nai
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: What Is More to Blame (Looking Back)

Post by Montegriffo »

heydaralon wrote:King George III wasn't so bad either.
He was no Edward I or Edward III but at least he wasn't an Edward II or an Edward VIII.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
heydaralon
Posts: 7571
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm

Re: What Is More to Blame (Looking Back)

Post by heydaralon »

Montegriffo wrote:
heydaralon wrote:King George III wasn't so bad either.
He was no Edward I or Edward III but at least he wasn't an Edward II or an Edward VIII.
I have a book on the Tudors and Henry VIII that I've been wanting to read for awhile. How is Henry viewed in England today? Favorably or critically?
Shikata ga nai
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: What Is More to Blame (Looking Back)

Post by Montegriffo »

heydaralon wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:
heydaralon wrote:King George III wasn't so bad either.
He was no Edward I or Edward III but at least he wasn't an Edward II or an Edward VIII.
I have a book on the Tudors and Henry VIII that I've been wanting to read for awhile. How is Henry viewed in England today? Favorably or critically?

Not so popular with the Catholics but wedding planners speak very highly of him.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
heydaralon
Posts: 7571
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm

Re: What Is More to Blame (Looking Back)

Post by heydaralon »

Montegriffo wrote:
heydaralon wrote:
Montegriffo wrote: He was no Edward I or Edward III but at least he wasn't an Edward II or an Edward VIII.
I have a book on the Tudors and Henry VIII that I've been wanting to read for awhile. How is Henry viewed in England today? Favorably or critically?

Not so popular with the Catholics but wedding planners speak very highly of him.
:lol:
Shikata ga nai
User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25408
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: What Is More to Blame (Looking Back)

Post by SuburbanFarmer »

Montegriffo wrote:
heydaralon wrote:
Montegriffo wrote: He was no Edward I or Edward III but at least he wasn't an Edward II or an Edward VIII.
I have a book on the Tudors and Henry VIII that I've been wanting to read for awhile. How is Henry viewed in England today? Favorably or critically?

Not so popular with the Catholics but wedding planners speak very highly of him.
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0
heydaralon
Posts: 7571
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm

Re: What Is More to Blame (Looking Back)

Post by heydaralon »

Fife wrote:
GloryofGreece wrote:Was the Reformation and the breakdown of the power of the Church ultimately more responsible for the world we live in today, or was the French Revolution even more impactful by pushing forth the destruction of organized religion and establishing leftist ideology overall?
Too soon to tell.
Lool
Zhou Enlai
Shikata ga nai