I mean.. I can see why he would want to bury his dismal record in this thread with cat pics. He not only failed to defend the mass migration policies, he actually came out on the side of Islamic terrorists (again).
Okeefenokee wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Okeefenokee wrote:
First, I can't cheer for lamppost hangings when said hangings are not occurring. If they were, I would view that as a breakdown of law and order and step in to prevent it.
Second, walking around with signs and chanting slogans is exactly what a protest is. Protesters being attacked is illegal. Get the fuck outa here with that inciting a riot bullshit. Those people were not assaulted. You need to find a dictionary. Assaulted is being visited with physical force, which those people were not. Assaulted is what happened to those protesters who were definitely assaulted with physical force.
Yes, and is a valid form of resistance to the government or a corporation. If I stand on the sidewalk in front of a gay guys house and scream insults at him, he has every moral right to beat me silly if the cops won't.
The Westboro bullshit with "drowning them out", and stupid ass "counter-protests" was pathetic to watch. Grab a bat and fix them up. Do 30 days for assault, and the nation would thank you. Instead they were granted a national platform for their bile, and are now world-famous for it.
There you have it, folks. The compassionate folks of the left.
Keep it up lefties. Keep excusing violence against your ideological opponents. Keep losing.
This is a guy who admits to wanting to perpetrate violence against people who say things he doesn't like. I guess we should be thankful all he has at his disposal here are cat pics.
Speaker to Animals wrote:You did not once attempt to debate honestly. You lost the debate and so your only recourse was to do the equivalent of shouting down the debate so nobody can read the arguments you failed to refute. You lost and this kind of shoddy behavior is all you have left. It's weak and pathetic.
You should know when you resort to this, you essentially lose. You were confronted with an argument. You failed to refute or even address it. You attempted to bury said argument under a pile of cat pics in the hopes that nobody will notice that you lost.
That's what you are doing right now.
I am perfectly prepared to debate this issue, just not with you Strangelove. You have proved time and time again to be incapable of honest debate about Muslims and about refugees and many other subjects. In the past I have tried to debate with you and all that happens is more lies. I could just foe you but instead I am going to post kitten pics until you learn to debate honestly or fuck off.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
I am the only one who bothered to present an argument here. All you presented were insults and cat pics.
Every cat pic you post is another reminder that you lost the debate. You couldn't debate me so you tried to bury my arguments under cat pics in the hope that nobody will see you lost.
Speaker to Animals wrote:I am the only one who bothered to present an argument here. All you presented were insults and cat pics.
Every cat pic you post is another reminder that you lost the debate. You couldn't debate me so you tried to bury my arguments under cat pics in the hope that nobody will see you lost.
More lies, I clearly stated that I didn't think there was any danger of Muslim immigrants destroying Western culture but as usual you don't bother to read anything which does not agree with your warped mind.
I mean you don't even have the honesty to come here as Strangelove or admit who you really are.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Question Monte; I understand, talking to people on the internet, that Europe is mostly still normal but it's in the cities where there are problems concerning Muslims. In your personal experience have you been to any of these cities? I heard London has some high percentage of Muslims but you don't here of many problems from them. Other than that child prostitute ring I can't think of much at least.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
