Page 10 of 303

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 8:55 pm
by TheReal_ND
What was Bjorn's again?

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 8:55 pm
by K@th
MilSpecs wrote:Stop it. No gender is worse at parenting than the other.
True story.

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 9:00 pm
by Speaker to Animals
MilSpecs wrote:Stop it. No gender is worse at parenting than the other.

When you subsidize bad parenting by only one gender, you will end up with a fuck ton of bad parents from that gender, as we now see with the plague of single motherhood, which by definition is bad parenting.

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Posted: Sat Jan 28, 2017 1:07 pm
by Okeefenokee
Fife wrote:
Kath wrote:My wet dream for SCOTUS is to make the 4th Amendment relevant again. And civil forfeiture must die.
Well I'm certainly on board with all that.

One of the uncountable losses of the destruction of the DCF was the links I worked up on the Mosaic Theory.

Your 4th amendment is on life 12.75, or thereabouts.

Scientists are making genetically modified cyborg dragonflies
https://www.reference.com/science/eats- ... 169284bbe9

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 9:54 am
by Fife
Well, the nomination is coming Tuesday now.

Trump cold re-animate O.W. Holmes, Jr., nominate him, and the DNC would call him Judge Hitler. It mattes not who he appoints.

So, the really interesting dynamic becomes the Turtle and the neocons vs. Trump on whether to "go nuclear."

The most interesting stuff so far is right around the corner.

I have doubts about how "sure" it is to go nuclear, at least in Round One.

Why the Supreme Court fight is sure to go nuclear

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 10:38 am
by C-Mag
Kath wrote:
MilSpecs wrote:Stop it. No gender is worse at parenting than the other.
True story.

Not according to the US Judicial System. Vagina bearers are better 90% of the time.

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 10:42 am
by K@th
C-Mag wrote: Vagina bearers are better 90% of the time.
Somewhere around 95% of custody discussions take place without a judge or moderator. The percentage of awards that go to the mother are only decided by a judge 5% of the time.

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 10:43 am
by Speaker to Animals
Kath wrote:
C-Mag wrote: Vagina bearers are better 90% of the time.
Somewhere around 95% of custody discussions take place without a judge or moderator. The percentage of awards that go to the mother are only decided by a judge 5% of the time.

That's total horseshit, Kath. You are talking about men giving up and losing their children after losing everything. I have been through the process. the judge will NEVER just make a decision like that in a contested divorce. It will drag on for years and year, and the man will have to pay all legal fees, until he is destitute and can no longer defend himself. Then it's over.

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 10:45 am
by Fife
Kath wrote:
C-Mag wrote: Vagina bearers are better 90% of the time.
Somewhere around 95% of custody discussions take place without a judge or moderator. The percentage of awards that go to the mother are only decided by a judge 5% of the time.

Somewhere around 100% of that post is fake news.

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2017 10:58 am
by K@th
Fife wrote: Somewhere around 100% of that post is fake news.
Sorry, I'm not a lawyer. Can you translate below?
Courts are changing as well; in the small percentage (5 percent) of custody cases that do go to litigation, judges are now more inclined to disregard gender and look at who's the better parent, says Gary Nickelson, president of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers. "
http://www.newsweek.com/divorce-new-rul ... tody-83545