Montegriffo wrote: Mon Jul 15, 2019 4:00 pm
Heaven forbid that workers should make claims for better conditions.
What sort of a commie fag nation are you running over there?
They have a right to do so. I was simply pointing out the stupidity of "striking" for 6 hours and then reporting back to work. Now you have even worse conditions because you are 6 hours behind. But hey, don't read the actual text, just skim and then react in the most predictable SJW fashion.
What makes you think I would waste my time talking to an ankle-biter like you?
Once again, it was a joke/dig at the expense of (apparently) humourless righties.
Jeeze, some of you really need to up your game...
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Flight line guys who were stationed there are laughing their asses off. One posted this meme:
Pretty sure you won't find aliens there, guys. But you will get a wicked beating.
God I wish they could just recall me to defend the installation's perimeter. You know there has to be a fuck ton of lolbergs wanting to storm the castle. The opportunity is glorious.
Montegriffo wrote: Mon Jul 15, 2019 4:00 pm
Heaven forbid that workers should make claims for better conditions.
What sort of a commie fag nation are you running over there?
They have a right to do so. I was simply pointing out the stupidity of "striking" for 6 hours and then reporting back to work. Now you have even worse conditions because you are 6 hours behind. But hey, don't read the actual text, just skim and then react in the most predictable SJW fashion.
What makes you think I would waste my time talking to an ankle-biter like you?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
SuburbanFarmer wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2019 9:35 am
Watching conservatives laugh at the notion of citizens resisting the security perimeter of a single us military base.
what a time.
You may be the only one really taking this seriously. It was intended for fun, I'm enjoying it.
SuburbanFarmer wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2019 9:35 am
Watching conservatives laugh at the notion of citizens resisting the security perimeter of a single us military base.
what a time.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.