The Conservative wrote:
Oh please, please, please, please let it hapepn... then we could get a state of Emergency and clean out all the shit in these places.
I’m sure a state of martial law won’t affect you at all...in Boston...Massachusetts...
I don't live in Boston, MA. Also, it wouldn't affect us at all. We all can work remotely and loose nothing. That's the nice thing about how I have things set up, All of Boston could burn down and we'd loose nothing.
And where I live, it wouldn't matter either, I live near NH, too many gun owners
Welp, I look forward to regular updates then, when the SHTF.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
I’m sure a state of martial law won’t affect you at all...in Boston...Massachusetts...
I don't live in Boston, MA. Also, it wouldn't affect us at all. We all can work remotely and loose nothing. That's the nice thing about how I have things set up, All of Boston could burn down and we'd loose nothing.
And where I live, it wouldn't matter either, I live near NH, too many gun owners
Welp, I look forward to regular updates then, when the SHTF.
When SHTF this place will be the third place to know.
Tucker Carlson had Lawrence Lessig on tonight to explain his chain of events for Hillary to be POTUS.
Lessig stumbled through it trying to show himself as rational. Lessig admitted it was a fantasy theory and there is no proof that Trump did any of the type. Lessig just looked goofy.
Trey Gowdy Opens Investigation Into DOJ's Exoneration of Hillary Clinton, 2016 Decisions
The Committees will investigate the following:
-FBI's decision to publicly announce the investigation into Secretary Clinton's handling of classified information but not to publicly announce the investigation into campaign associates of then-candidate Donald Trump;
-FBI's decision to notify Congress by formal letter of the status of the investigation both in October and November of 2016;
-FBI's decision to appropriate full decision making in respect to charging or not charging Secretary Clinton to the -FBI rather than the DOJ; and
-FBI's timeline in respect to charging decisions.