THE ERA OF TRUMP

[pineapplemike]

Second - Since the president has no constitutional obligation to talk to the press, why does a court get to decide who gets to be in the entirely optional press room? This doesn't make sense to me.

It's likely a liberal court. They feel it's their mission to do what they "feelz", not what the law says.

Kelly, a Trump appointee, said that his ruling was based on CNN and Acosta's Fifth Amendment claims, arguing that the White House did not give him the due process legally necessary to revoke his press pass.

this is a great example of fake news, righty kiddos on the_donald acting like this is a first amendment issue and alex jones deserves a press pass (something im not opposed to) while righty adults on MHF acting like a lefty court is to blame

:/

[Kath]

It's likely a liberal court. They feel it's their mission to do what they "feelz", not what the law says.

You'd think that, but no, it's a Trump appointment.

[Speaker to Animals]

You do not need "due process" to have your press pass revoked. They don't want him there. CNN needs to find somebody else.

[Kath]

You do not need "due process" to have your press pass revoked. They don't want him there. CNN needs to find somebody else.

Well, a Trump appointed judge disagrees with us.

[Martin Hash]

You do not need "due process" to have your press pass revoked. They don't want him there. CNN needs to find somebody else.

Well, a Trump appointed judge disagrees with us.

Some new Right is developing here. Now that members of The Press aren't At Will, and can demand to be present, there's got to be at least 10,000 "reporters" who have the Right to be there. In fact, I bet the gears are turning now for Richard Spencer to go to the Press Corp room.

[TheReal_ND]

Has anyone seen Kyle? He's about this tall. I'm looking for a friend. Seen Kyle?

[C-Mag]

You do not need "due process" to have your press pass revoked. They don't want him there. CNN needs to find somebody else.

Well, a Trump appointed judge disagrees with us.

Some new Right is developing here. Now that members of The Press aren't At Will, and can demand to be present, there's got to be at least 10,000 "reporters" who have the Right to be there. In fact, I bet the gears are turning now for Richard Spencer to go to the Press Corp room.

This actually could be a great thing.
The Washington Press Corps is generally filled with Swamp Sycophants anyway.

[Kath]

Some new Right is developing here. Now that members of The Press aren't At Will, and can demand to be present, there's got to be at least 10,000 "reporters" who have the Right to be there. In fact, I bet the gears are turning now for Richard Spencer to go to the Press Corp room.

From your legal point of view, what constitutional right does a court have to require the president to invite someone to a party he's not constitutionally required to hold?

[nmoore63]

To be clear, The court didn't rule that the reporter has a right to a pass.
They ordered its reinstatement until they can get all the facts.

I mean, the court is still off in crazy town, just saying....

[Kath]

To be clear, The court didn't rule that the reporter has a right to a pass.
They ordered its reinstatement until they can get all the facts.

I mean, the court is still off in crazy town, just saying....

Which is why I hope he stops the pressers until this gets resolved. I see no constitutional basis for him to have ruled in Acosta's favor today. At a minimum, throw the CNN seat in the back row and just don't call on him, ever. Surely a judge can't require him to call on specific reporters. (Well, who knows ,these days.)