ITT post property price in your area MUSLIM EDITION

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: ITT post property price (generally) in your area

Post by Speaker to Animals »

Fife wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote: Maybe consider Texas.
Or Utah. Definitely Utah. Not Tennessee. Utah.

Yeah, I heard Tennessee is really expensive. Avoid this whole area.
User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26048
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: ITT post property price (generally) in your area

Post by TheReal_ND »

Speaker to Animals wrote:Yeah, what was I thinking? Appalachia is like a million per acre too. You guys definitely would not make it here. Maybe consider Texas.
Fair weather friends right there
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: ITT post property price (generally) in your area

Post by Speaker to Animals »

TheReal_ND wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:Yeah, what was I thinking? Appalachia is like a million per acre too. You guys definitely would not make it here. Maybe consider Texas.
Fair weather friends right there

Just damage control and containment.
User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25426
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: ITT post property price (generally) in your area

Post by SuburbanFarmer »

Zlaxer wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:Yeah, what was I thinking? Appalachia is like a million per acre too. You guys definitely would not make it here. Maybe consider Texas.

There's a reason the land is cheap....Texas sucks.
You did not just say that.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18802
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: ITT post property price (generally) in your area

Post by Montegriffo »

TheReal_ND wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:
TheReal_ND wrote:That's actually fairly interesting though. I bet it's some sort of leftist policy to attempt to ensure small farming.
No, it's about protecting the green belt to stop over development. If you can buy a minimum of 13 acres it is possible to get residential permission as a small holding but not guaranteed.
Best thing to do is buy woodland and hide your truck/bender in the middle of it. Or better still move to France,Spain or Portugal where you can buy a run down farmhouse with 10 acres for peanuts.
Bender?
A type of tent made from bending hazel branches over, sticking them in the ground and covering them with a tarp. Popular with new age travellers but ancient in origin.
Image
Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18802
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: ITT post property price (generally) in your area

Post by Montegriffo »

Fife wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:
TheReal_ND wrote:That's actually fairly interesting though. I bet it's some sort of leftist policy to attempt to ensure small farming.
No, it's about protecting the green belt to stop over development. If you can buy a minimum of 13 acres it is possible to get residential permission as a small holding but not guaranteed.
Best thing to do is buy woodland and hide your truck/bender in the middle of it. Or better still move to France,Spain or Portugal where you can buy a run down farmhouse with 10 acres for peanuts.
Disallowing normal people from owning property is a feature, not a bug, for serious statists.

In the UK you probably must have a license from the crown to plant a potato in a window box.
England is a green and pleasant land. Tough planning laws keep it that way. It also protects agricultural land for farming rather than losing it to housing development.
Anarchists like yourself would have it covered with ugly houses and shanty towns.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
Ex-California
Posts: 4116
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:37 pm

Re: ITT post property price (generally) in your area

Post by Ex-California »

Montegriffo wrote:
Fife wrote:
Montegriffo wrote: No, it's about protecting the green belt to stop over development. If you can buy a minimum of 13 acres it is possible to get residential permission as a small holding but not guaranteed.
Best thing to do is buy woodland and hide your truck/bender in the middle of it. Or better still move to France,Spain or Portugal where you can buy a run down farmhouse with 10 acres for peanuts.
Disallowing normal people from owning property is a feature, not a bug, for serious statists.

In the UK you probably must have a license from the crown to plant a potato in a window box.
England is a green and pleasant land. Tough planning laws keep it that way. It also protects agricultural land for farming rather than losing it to housing development.
Anarchists like yourself would have it covered with ugly houses and shanty towns.
Jesus Christ.

"The manor is the Lord's land"
No man's life, liberty, or property are safe while the legislature is in session
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: ITT post property price (generally) in your area

Post by Speaker to Animals »

He can't see it, man.
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18802
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: ITT post property price (generally) in your area

Post by Montegriffo »

Look, it's a small country with limited land available. If people could just build wherever they wanted just because they have enough money to buy some land it would spoil the countryside. What is so hard to understand about that?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: ITT post property price (generally) in your area

Post by Speaker to Animals »

Montegriffo wrote:Look, it's a small country with limited land available. If people could just build wherever they wanted just because they have enough money to buy some land it would spoil the countryside. What is so hard to understand about that?

There exits a large distinction between sublotting the land into a neighborhood and allowing farmers to build farmhouses on their farmland..