Second Amendment Thread

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25408
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Second Amendment Thread

Post by SuburbanFarmer »

Okeefenokee wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Okeefenokee wrote:You'd think you folks would have figured out that not all women vote in a block, and not all women support the nanny-state.
It doesn't matter how they vote, dipstick. That's the point.
judo chop!

that's why you just got through saying the nanny state is the result of women voting, because it doesn't matter how women vote. brilliant.
Hey there, straw merchant.

No, I said that the rise of the nanny state is due to the rise of women in our society. Voting has little or nothing to do with it, outside of general referendums (which are sadly all to rare in America).

It makes absolutely no difference whether you elect Shitstain D or Shitstain R.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0
Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Second Amendment Thread

Post by Okeefenokee »

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Okeefenokee wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
It doesn't matter how they vote, dipstick. That's the point.
judo chop!

that's why you just got through saying the nanny state is the result of women voting, because it doesn't matter how women vote. brilliant.
Hey there, straw merchant.

No, I said that the rise of the nanny state is due to the rise of women in our society. Voting has little or nothing to do with it, outside of general referendums (which are sadly all to rare in America).

It makes absolutely no difference whether you elect Shitstain D or Shitstain R.
Yeah, we all know Hillary would be sending ICE on raids right now to round up illegals. No difference at all, dude. /bonghit.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25408
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Second Amendment Thread

Post by SuburbanFarmer »

Okeefenokee wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Okeefenokee wrote:
judo chop!

that's why you just got through saying the nanny state is the result of women voting, because it doesn't matter how women vote. brilliant.
Hey there, straw merchant.

No, I said that the rise of the nanny state is due to the rise of women in our society. Voting has little or nothing to do with it, outside of general referendums (which are sadly all to rare in America).

It makes absolutely no difference whether you elect Shitstain D or Shitstain R.
Yeah, we all know Hillary would be sending ICE on raids right now to round up illegals. No difference at all, dude. /bonghit.
I guess it makes a difference to a few thousand illegals, but nothing of substance to the nation.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0
User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Second Amendment Thread

Post by Fife »

Image
User avatar
de officiis
Posts: 2528
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:09 am

Re: Second Amendment Thread

Post by de officiis »

"Serving and protecting with Aloha!" :doh:
Image
User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Second Amendment Thread

Post by Fife »

CHOOM GANG