SuburbanFarmer wrote: Fri Oct 08, 2021 8:28 am
I wouldn’t equate avoiding traditional marriage with CRT.
The modern concept of marriage is a binding legal contract with zero upside, except for visitation rights in a hospital.
Also power-of-attorney & inheritance: both of which could be handled with other binding legal contracts.
The real advantage of marriage is commitment, especially with children. People who are committed to each other should get married, not for any social benefit, but for each other. If you're planning on staying with the mother of your children, even if you don't love her, get married.
+1
I mean, what are you saying if you don't? Keeping options open, or what?
An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna
Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck
SuburbanFarmer wrote: Fri Oct 08, 2021 8:28 am
I wouldn’t equate avoiding traditional marriage with CRT.
The modern concept of marriage is a binding legal contract with zero upside, except for visitation rights in a hospital.
Also power-of-attorney & inheritance: both of which could be handled with other binding legal contracts.
The real advantage of marriage is commitment, especially with children. People who are committed to each other should get married, not for any social benefit, but for each other. If you're planning on staying with the mother of your children, even if you don't love her, get married.
Now why on earth would I do that?
I’m either committed or I’m not. There’s no sense in spending $20k to have a ceremony and half my future wealth when the kids are grown and I move on.
What’s the benefit to me?
The ceremony is worth the experience. Planning to move on, however, means you’re not committed so…
Martin Hash wrote: Fri Oct 08, 2021 8:41 am
Also power-of-attorney & inheritance: both of which could be handled with other binding legal contracts.
The real advantage of marriage is commitment, especially with children. People who are committed to each other should get married, not for any social benefit, but for each other. If you're planning on staying with the mother of your children, even if you don't love her, get married.
Now why on earth would I do that?
I’m either committed or I’m not. There’s no sense in spending $20k to have a ceremony and half my future wealth when the kids are grown and I move on.
What’s the benefit to me?
The ceremony is worth the experience. Planning to move on, however, means you’re not committed so…
I assumed that you were referring to commitment to the kids. Not committed to her at all, but that does raise the question…. Do women require a ‘committed man’ for their welfare? Sounds pretty sexist.
Fathers are committed or they aren’t. Marriage makes no difference to that.
I just wanted to make sure that my chic could get my social security and inherit my union bennies. And maybe visit me in the hospital and witness my last breath or two.
According to the Centers for Disease Control, about one million people in the U.S. identify as transgender. That’s about 0.6% of the adult population.
I guess less people die from the covaids but I don't get why this is a priority with anyone.
To me it's just another lie. The Trannies aren't fooling anyone, and they've never fooled anyone but the falling down drunk dude getting blown by a Trannie in an alley.
The lie is reinforced when people start calling Bruce Jenner, Katy Jenner, and Katy is a woman.
