Isn't that basically like stuffing classified documents in your underwear? If so, nothing will happen.Kath wrote:Rumor that Omarosa may have taped conversations she had in private meetings at the WH, including meetings with the president.
For the lawyers - if this is true, did she break a law? I can't imagine it's legal to secretly tape the president during confidential meetings.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01 ... tions.html
THE ERA OF TRUMP
-
TheReal_ND
- Posts: 26048
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14807
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Yeah, I mean we caught Clinton with a server in her bathroom...TheReal_ND wrote:Isn't that basically like stuffing classified documents in your underwear? If so, nothing will happen.Kath wrote:Rumor that Omarosa may have taped conversations she had in private meetings at the WH, including meetings with the president.
For the lawyers - if this is true, did she break a law? I can't imagine it's legal to secretly tape the president during confidential meetings.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01 ... tions.html
#NotOneRedCent
-
C-Mag
- Posts: 28382
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
TheReal_ND wrote:Isn't that basically like stuffing classified documents in your underwear? If so, nothing will happen.Kath wrote:Rumor that Omarosa may have taped conversations she had in private meetings at the WH, including meetings with the president.
For the lawyers - if this is true, did she break a law? I can't imagine it's legal to secretly tape the president during confidential meetings.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01 ... tions.html
Those docs just got burned in Chappaqua
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
Fife
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14807
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
#NotOneRedCent
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25411
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
The Conservative wrote:26815092_2040166206201284_561365529872404695_n.jpg
-
C-Mag
- Posts: 28382
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
Okeefenokee
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
C-Mag wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... Trump.html
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo !
We don't need the spoiled Ivanka as President. She's a rabid liberal who's already made Trump make some bad decisions.
Conservatives in America do not at all like her policies or philosophies.We voted for her father, NOT her. Personally, we like her. She's smart, hard working, beautiful and classy. But, she's very much a LIBERAL. She's in favor if so many policies we abhor, including killing babies in the womb.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14807
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
If she ran instead of Hillary, we'd still have a Trump in the WH...C-Mag wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... Trump.html
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo !
#NotOneRedCent
-
DBTrek
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
If two Trumps ran for president we’d still have a Trump in the White House.The Conservative wrote:If she ran instead of Hillary, we'd still have a Trump in the WH...C-Mag wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... Trump.html
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo !
That’s deep.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"