Car Talk

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Car Talk

Post by Montegriffo »

C-Mag wrote: Thu Oct 03, 2019 6:40 pm Looks like you're right.

That thing is bad ass.
Well, it's some major engineering to convert rear-wheel drive into 4x4. Especially in the 40's when the car was probably adapted.
Still cool AF though. Wooden spokes on the rears is a really nice touch. It's amazing that not only the wheels but the tyres have survived intact.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Car Talk

Post by Montegriffo »

I might have a new favourite car. 1929 6.5 litre Bentley tourer. Yours for a mere $1.2 million.
Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Car Talk

Post by Montegriffo »

Classic 70's rally car.
Image

Image

Lancia Stratos.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Car Talk

Post by Montegriffo »

Magnesium bodied Bugatti Aerolithe.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Car Talk

Post by Montegriffo »

One for Carlus

Image

Plus a John Deere if you only want 2 wheels on you tractor

Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Car Talk

Post by Montegriffo »

Love Bug getting it on...

Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Car Talk

Post by Montegriffo »

Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Car Talk

Post by Montegriffo »

How pirates' children go to school

Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Car Talk

Post by Montegriffo »

Just because you can, doesn't mean you should

Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18791
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Car Talk

Post by Montegriffo »

Drugs were involved

Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top

Return to “Odds & Ends”