Real Rules?

Do you support any of the below rules for decorum on the forum?

Do not shit on Martin and do not shit in his threads.
7
21%
The owner of a thread gets to decide when the off-topic detour becomes disruptive/spam
6
18%
No hardcore porn, including descriptive text
8
24%
None of the above
12
36%
 
Total votes: 33
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18794
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by Montegriffo »

BjornP wrote:We really have 24 users on this board?
No probably not. Multiple votes are allowed in this poll. I would guess that 16 members voted.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top
User avatar
BjornP
Posts: 3360
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Real Rules?

Post by BjornP »

Oooooh..... right. Long day.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.
Top
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18794
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by Montegriffo »

11 people don't object to porn being posted or Martins threads being shit on and 13 people don't think the OP should decide when a thread is being derailed.
No other members considered it worth voting.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top
K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by K@th »

Based on the amount of negative feedback we're getting about hockey spam, my guess is that some people didn't care enough to vote, because fuck that. They are just going to leave instead.
Account abandoned.
Top
User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Real Rules?

Post by StCapps »

Kath wrote:Based on the amount of negative feedback we're getting about hockey spam, my guess is that some people didn't care enough to vote, because fuck that. They are just going to leave instead.
*yip*
Top
Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by Smitty-48 »

Charlie don't surf, who knew?
Nec Aspera Terrent
Top
K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by K@th »

TheReal_ND wrote:

Implying you two autists can't sperg a thread to death.
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Thanks for the new vocabulary word. I'm totally using that on the kid the next time he starts droning on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on
Account abandoned.
Top
Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by Smitty-48 »

Infinite war is infinite. It's the American way.
Nec Aspera Terrent
Top
User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18794
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by Montegriffo »

Smitty-48 wrote:Infinite war is infinite. It's the American way.
Sooner or later it will result in nuclear armageddon though and all life will be extinguished. MAD only works when neither side is mad.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image
Top
Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by Smitty-48 »

Montegriffo wrote:
Smitty-48 wrote:Infinite war is infinite. It's the American way.
Sooner or later it will result in nuclear armageddon though and all life will be extinguished. MAD only works when neither side is mad.
Break, break, all call signs, this is Night Watch Actual, radio check, radio check, holding at DEFCON 3 . . .
Nec Aspera Terrent
Top

Return to “Welcome”