Real Rules?

Do you support any of the below rules for decorum on the forum?

Do not shit on Martin and do not shit in his threads.
7
21%
The owner of a thread gets to decide when the off-topic detour becomes disruptive/spam
6
18%
No hardcore porn, including descriptive text
8
24%
None of the above
12
36%
 
Total votes: 33

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Real Rules?

Post by StCapps » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:39 pm

Kath wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Just like other SJWs, it's never 'over'. He's got his mojo now, you've given him power. He feels like a special boy, with big pants on. Now he's on to the next imagined "threat" to fight against.

Of course, he's just spamming forum threads, and irritating about a dozen people, but that's enough for him I guess.
They are only helping my case, at this point. I stopped firing missiles on Sunday, so they are fighting only against themselves.
You fired missiles on Wednesday, that was two days ago. Claims of Kath abandoning the field have been greatly exaggerated.
*yip*

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Real Rules?

Post by DBTrek » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:40 pm

I don’t have to claim anything.
I just make logical, concise points.
Then you respond with non-sequiturs.
/shrug
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Real Rules?

Post by StCapps » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:41 pm

DBTrek wrote:I don’t have to claim anything.
I just make logical, concise points.
Then you respond with non-sequiturs.
/shrug
Every man a sovereign, no need for a king to rule you. Enshrined in your declaration of independence, not anarchy, a little too close to anarchy for the tastes of monarchists perhaps, but not to Americans. The forum is the American Hurly Burly incarnate, not a non-sequitur, you're just too dumb to follow.
Last edited by StCapps on Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Real Rules?

Post by DBTrek » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:42 pm

Martin Hash wrote:Smitty said “no rules.”

That’ll be no rules then. (Here anyway, I still got to get famous.)
Anarchy. For the high ass derp sherpas.
;)
Last edited by DBTrek on Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by K@th » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:42 pm

StCapps wrote: You fired missiles on Wednesday, that was two days ago. Claims of Kath abandoning the field have been greatly exaggerated.

False.

The entirety of Wednesday's mod activities. One post deleted, but not by me.

Martin Hash Wed Feb 21, 2018 4:55 pm Banned user for reason “Username banned via user management”
Martin Hash Wed Feb 21, 2018 4:55 pm Banned IP for reason “IP banned via user management”
Smitty-48 Wed Feb 21, 2018 4:25 pm Deleted post “Re: Real Rules?” written by “Smitty-48” for the following reason
Martin Hash Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:40 pm Banned user for reason “Username banned via user management”
Martin Hash Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:40 pm Banned IP for reason “IP banned via user management”
Kath Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:27 pm Banned IP for reason “IP banned via user management”
Kath Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:27 pm Banned email for reason “Email address banned via user management”
Account abandoned.

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Real Rules?

Post by StCapps » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:45 pm

Kath wrote:
StCapps wrote: You fired missiles on Wednesday, that was two days ago. Claims of Kath abandoning the field have been greatly exaggerated.

False.

The entirety of Wednesday's mod activities. One post deleted, but not by me.

Martin Hash Wed Feb 21, 2018 4:55 pm Banned user for reason “Username banned via user management”
Martin Hash Wed Feb 21, 2018 4:55 pm Banned IP for reason “IP banned via user management”
Smitty-48 Wed Feb 21, 2018 4:25 pm Deleted post “Re: Real Rules?” written by “Smitty-48” for the following reason
Martin Hash Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:40 pm Banned user for reason “Username banned via user management”
Martin Hash Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:40 pm Banned IP for reason “IP banned via user management”
Kath Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:27 pm Banned IP for reason “IP banned via user management”
Kath Wed Feb 21, 2018 3:27 pm Banned email for reason “Email address banned via user management
That proves it. No way you could have omitted censoring clubby in attempt to fool idiots, by posting a bunch of instances that weren't censoring clubby, that's impossible.
:lol:
*yip*

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Real Rules?

Post by DBTrek » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:47 pm

Hiiiiiiiiiiiiiigh as shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit that lap-dogging Canadian.
:lol:
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Real Rules?

Post by StCapps » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:48 pm

When losing argument, claim StCapps is high.
/shrugs
*yip*

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by K@th » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:48 pm

Image
Account abandoned.

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Real Rules?

Post by StCapps » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:49 pm

Kath wrote:Image
Cherry picking doesn't prove your point. It shows you censored Smitty too on that day, so again you fired missiles on Wednesday, while pretending you didn't. You just posted proof that you are liar, so why should we believe you? Because you omitted censoring clubgop from that screenshot?
:lol:
Last edited by StCapps on Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:51 pm, edited 2 times in total.
*yip*