Real Rules?

[StCapps]

Another option is that people just not be douche bags.That would work, too.

Attempting to force people to not be douche bags via censorship is frowned on around these parts, who knew? Not Child Porn Sally, she thought everyone would support her idiocy instead, because she projected her butthurt on the rest of the folks on this forum.

You fucking won, asshole. You censored out all Olympic talk, making discussion impossible. Congratulations! Whose the big boy?

We didn't censor anyone, they censored themselves because they couldn't handle any thread jacking. Not our fault you Olympics Fags are bunch of self-censoring pussies.
/shrugs

[DBTrek]

Anarchy is no rules.

What people talk about under anarchy, monarchy, oligarchy, or democracy has no effect on the structure (or non structure) under which conversations take place.

So anarchy is what we have.
Oligarchy is what some want.
Monarchy per thread is another alternative.

No need to snowflake over an accurate use of the term anarchy. It cant hurt you. It’s just a word.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Just like other SJWs, it's never 'over'. He's got his mojo now, you've given him power. He feels like a special boy, with big pants on. Now he's on to the next imagined "threat" to fight against.

Of course, he's just spamming forum threads, and irritating about a dozen people, but that's enough for him I guess.

[K@th]

Literally two people with dicks so frozen they have nothing to do but jack threads. Other people have lives, so a very small thread with very few people gets drowned out by dozens of pages of asshattery.

So compelling; why wouldn't anyone want to scroll through pages and pages of your bullshit? Truly.

[StCapps]

Anarchy is no rules.

What people talk about under anarchy, monarchy, oligarchy, or democracy has no effect on the structure (or non structure) under which conversations take place.

So anarchy is what we have.
Oligarchy is what some want.
Monarchy per thread is another alternative.

No need to snowflake over an accurate use of the term anarchy. It cant hurt you. It’s just a word.

Every man a king is not anarchy, you live in a nation with that ethos.
/shrugs

[K@th]

It cant hurt you. It’s just a word.

Capps is afraid of words.

[StCapps]

Literally two people with dicks so frozen they have nothing to do but jack threads. Other people have lives, so a very small thread with very few people gets drowned out by dozens of pages of asshattery.

So compelling; why wouldn't anyone want to scroll through pages and pages of your bullshit? Truly.

Ain't our fault you are lazy and whinny fucks.

[DBTrek]

Anarchy is no rules.

What people talk about under anarchy, monarchy, oligarchy, or democracy has no effect on the structure (or non structure) under which conversations take place.

So anarchy is what we have.
Oligarchy is what some want.
Monarchy per thread is another alternative.

No need to snowflake over an accurate use of the term anarchy. It cant hurt you. It’s just a word.

Every man a king is not anarchy, you live in a nation with that ethos.
/shrugs

You’re so high you have no idea what you’re even saying. I’m talking about the forum, not America.

[K@th]

Just like other SJWs, it's never 'over'. He's got his mojo now, you've given him power. He feels like a special boy, with big pants on. Now he's on to the next imagined "threat" to fight against.

Of course, he's just spamming forum threads, and irritating about a dozen people, but that's enough for him I guess.

They are only helping my case, at this point. I stopped firing missiles on Sunday, so they are fighting only against themselves.

[StCapps]

Anarchy is no rules.

What people talk about under anarchy, monarchy, oligarchy, or democracy has no effect on the structure (or non structure) under which conversations take place.

So anarchy is what we have.
Oligarchy is what some want.
Monarchy per thread is another alternative.

No need to snowflake over an accurate use of the term anarchy. It cant hurt you. It’s just a word.

Every man a king is not anarchy, you live in a nation with that ethos.
/shrugs

You’re so high you have no idea what you’re even saying.

When DB has no arguments, he claims I'm high, just like StA. It's the go to crutch of those losing an argument with me.