Real Rules?

Do you support any of the below rules for decorum on the forum?

Do not shit on Martin and do not shit in his threads.
7
21%
The owner of a thread gets to decide when the off-topic detour becomes disruptive/spam
6
18%
No hardcore porn, including descriptive text
8
24%
None of the above
12
36%
 
Total votes: 33

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by K@th » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:29 pm

DBTrek wrote:Martin is a complete s I wiz. Just code it so each user is a moderator of any thread they start.
I don't believe that's an available option on PhpBB, but I can check into it.

Another option is that people just not be douche bags.That would work, too.
Account abandoned.

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Real Rules?

Post by StCapps » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:29 pm

Kath wrote:
StCapps wrote: Lies, you censored clubby the day before yesterday.
False. No such action took place. Clubby is mistaken.
I remember the post, it was deleted, and you were the one who deleted it.
*yip*

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: Real Rules?

Post by DBTrek » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:30 pm

Smitty-48 wrote:Virtual pub, it's loud, it's rowdy, there are fights in the alley, if you want peace and quiet, public library is down the road.
Pubs do not operate under anarchy, so I think we can safely say this is not a virtual pub.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by Smitty-48 » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:30 pm

DBTrek wrote:
Smitty-48 wrote: It's a virtual pub not the public library.
Then it should be able to weather discussions on hypothetical alternatives just fine.
;)
That's what I'm doing, but I'm gonna fight to keep the virtual pub, I'm not one for the public library.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Real Rules?

Post by StCapps » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:31 pm

Kath wrote:Another option is that people just not be douche bags.That would work, too.
Attempting to force people to not be douche bags via censorship is frowned on around these parts, who knew? Not Child Porn Sally, she thought everyone would support her idiocy instead, because she projected her butthurt on the rest of the folks on this forum.
Last edited by StCapps on Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by Smitty-48 » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:32 pm

DBTrek wrote:
Smitty-48 wrote:Virtual pub, it's loud, it's rowdy, there are fights in the alley, if you want peace and quiet, public library is down the road.
Pubs do not operate under anarchy, so I think we can safely say this is not a virtual pub.
"Anarchy" is hyperventilation, people talking hockey is not anarchy, it's just people talking hockey.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: Real Rules?

Post by StCapps » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:33 pm

Smitty-48 wrote:
DBTrek wrote:
Smitty-48 wrote:Virtual pub, it's loud, it's rowdy, there are fights in the alley, if you want peace and quiet, public library is down the road.
Pubs do not operate under anarchy, so I think we can safely say this is not a virtual pub.
"Anarchy" is hyperventilation, people talking hockey is not anarchy, it's just people talking hockey.
That's the kind of silly justification for censorship that Kath would make. "Child Porn", "Content Organization", "Anarchy", same-same.
Last edited by StCapps on Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by K@th » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:33 pm

StCapps wrote:
Kath wrote:Another option is that people just not be douche bags.That would work, too.
Attempting to force people to not be douche bags via censorship is frowned on around these parts, who knew? Not Child Porn Sally, she thought everyone would support her idiocy instead, because she projected her butthurt on the rest of the folks on this forum.
You fucking won, asshole. You censored out all Olympic talk, making discussion impossible. Congratulations! Whose the big boy?
Account abandoned.

K@th
Posts: 3513
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by K@th » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:34 pm

Image
Account abandoned.

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Real Rules?

Post by Smitty-48 » Fri Feb 23, 2018 12:34 pm

StCapps wrote:
Smitty-48 wrote:
DBTrek wrote:
Pubs do not operate under anarchy, so I think we can safely say this is not a virtual pub.
"Anarchy" is hyperventilation, people talking hockey is not anarchy, it's just people talking hockey.
That's the kind of silly justification for censorship that Kath would make.
The Americans are going into their knee jerk temperance crusader mode, save the republic from the "Anarchy!" of strong drink and people talking sports at the bar.
Nec Aspera Terrent