The internet takeover thread

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by Okeefenokee » Wed Aug 08, 2018 3:17 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by Okeefenokee » Wed Aug 08, 2018 3:18 pm

Image
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by Okeefenokee » Wed Aug 08, 2018 4:48 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28090
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by C-Mag » Wed Aug 08, 2018 9:53 pm

This Bill made it legal for Google, Twitter and Facebook to Censor people,
guess what people in our government are pulling the strings, it's called the
Center for Information Analysis and Response

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-con ... /5181/text
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18695
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by Montegriffo » Wed Aug 08, 2018 11:31 pm

C-Mag wrote:
Wed Aug 08, 2018 9:53 pm
This Bill made it legal for Google, Twitter and Facebook to Censor people,
guess what people in our government are pulling the strings, it's called the
Center for Information Analysis and Response

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-con ... /5181/text
So does a private company have the right to withdraw services to whoever it wants or not?
Now bake my goddamn cake...
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Hastur
Posts: 5297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: suiþiuþu

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by Hastur » Thu Aug 09, 2018 12:17 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Aug 08, 2018 11:31 pm
C-Mag wrote:
Wed Aug 08, 2018 9:53 pm
This Bill made it legal for Google, Twitter and Facebook to Censor people,
guess what people in our government are pulling the strings, it's called the
Center for Information Analysis and Response

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-con ... /5181/text
So does a private company have the right to withdraw services to whoever it wants or not?
Now bake my goddamn cake...

That's exactly the point Matt discusses in this video.
Okeefenokee wrote:
Wed Aug 08, 2018 2:03 pm
Image

An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna

Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28090
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by C-Mag » Thu Aug 09, 2018 12:38 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Aug 08, 2018 11:31 pm

So does a private company have the right to withdraw services to whoever it wants or not?
Now bake my goddamn cake...
I only have superficial knowledge of how the law works. But it looks like to me they made the internet more or less a public utility without talking to us about it. They have a Steering Committee ran by the Government with oversite.

You want a cake, write Youtube and see if they will let you watch the fuckin video.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18695
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Aug 09, 2018 12:48 am

You failed to answer the question.
Does a business have the right to refuse service or not?

Unless it refuses on grounds of race, sex, religion or sexual preference it can refuse service to anyone, especially when it considers that person to be damaging their brand.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28090
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by C-Mag » Thu Aug 09, 2018 1:12 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Thu Aug 09, 2018 12:48 am
You failed to answer the question.
Does a business have the right to refuse service or not?

Unless it refuses on grounds of race, sex, religion or sexual preference it can refuse service to anyone, especially when it considers that person to be damaging their brand.
It's a public utility with government oversite. Free Speech must be upheld. This is not about a mom and pop cake shop in one town. They are a regulated under US Law on the conduct and organization of business corporations, which are required to promote fair competition and access for the benefit of consumers. Furthermore, the US Government utilizes these digital communication giants.

When they are almost solely censoring the free speech of a certain group it falls under illegal restrictive practices. More or less they are telling niggers they can't eat at the counter, it's only for elite whites.

So, NO, I don't believe this type of Censorship is Legal, nor should it be allowed.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: The internet takeover thread

Post by clubgop » Thu Aug 09, 2018 1:16 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Thu Aug 09, 2018 12:48 am
You failed to answer the question.
Does a business have the right to refuse service or not?

Unless it refuses on grounds of race, sex, religion or sexual preference it can refuse service to anyone, especially when it considers that person to be damaging their brand.
It's not about the right to do it. They have it. The problem arises in the pandora's box they have opened. Once they appoint themselves the censors it is a shitstorm that never ends. There is a lesson in this and it comes in terms of you. Your whining bitch ass opened a Pandora's box that drove one moderator eventually crazy and the owner to throw open the doors altogether and run loose. Twitter has pretty much thrown up thier hands and said you are on your own. Pretty much what happened here. They gave into the whining bitches (you) once, it attracts the whining bitches to do more whining (check), they eventually give up and leave the bitches (you) on their own to act like the tough guy you are not to try to protect yourself from the consequences of bitches that we all know you are.

Image