North Korea News

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: North Korea News

Post by Smitty-48 » Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:53 pm

If we can't kill North Korea with fire, then just get rid of the Pentagon, wtf good is it, if we can't nuke hell itself?
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: North Korea News

Post by StCapps » Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:02 am

Smitty-48 wrote:
Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:53 pm
If we can't kill North Korea with fire, then just get rid of the Pentagon, wtf good is it, if we can't nuke hell itself?
Upgrading to n-bombs would be nice, that way hell can be nuked without Russia or China receiving the fallout.
*yip*

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: North Korea News

Post by Smitty-48 » Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:22 am

StCapps wrote:
Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:02 am
Smitty-48 wrote:
Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:53 pm
If we can't kill North Korea with fire, then just get rid of the Pentagon, wtf good is it, if we can't nuke hell itself?
Upgrading to n-bombs would be nice, that way hell can be nuked without Russia or China receiving the fallout.
Problem is the regime is dug in deep, the N-bomb will kill the people, but it won't get the regime targets.

I'd rather hit the regime targets with the B83's, and take the fallout.

Ain't no thang, a little Chernobyl in your coffee, no problemo.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: North Korea News

Post by StCapps » Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:25 am

Smitty-48 wrote:
Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:22 am
StCapps wrote:
Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:02 am
Smitty-48 wrote:
Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:53 pm
If we can't kill North Korea with fire, then just get rid of the Pentagon, wtf good is it, if we can't nuke hell itself?
Upgrading to n-bombs would be nice, that way hell can be nuked without Russia or China receiving the fallout.
Problem is the regime is dug in deep, the N-bomb will kill the people, but it won't get the regime targets.

I'd rather hit the regime targets with the B83's, and take the fallout.

Ain't no thang, a little Chernobyl in your coffee, no problemo.
Pre-emptive strike that Orwellian nightmare, before they launch on accident, because their early warning systems suck monkey balls.
*yip*

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: North Korea News

Post by Smitty-48 » Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:29 am

StCapps wrote:
Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:25 am
Smitty-48 wrote:
Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:22 am
StCapps wrote:
Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:02 am
Upgrading to n-bombs would be nice, that way hell can be nuked without Russia or China receiving the fallout.
Problem is the regime is dug in deep, the N-bomb will kill the people, but it won't get the regime targets.

I'd rather hit the regime targets with the B83's, and take the fallout.

Ain't no thang, a little Chernobyl in your coffee, no problemo.
Pre-emptive strike that Orwellian nightmare, before they launch on accident, because their early warning systems suck monkey balls.
They have no early warning at all, don't even need the F-35, their IADS is old and busted Soviet junk.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: North Korea News

Post by StCapps » Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:33 am

Smitty-48 wrote:
Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:29 am
StCapps wrote:
Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:25 am
Smitty-48 wrote:
Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:22 am

Problem is the regime is dug in deep, the N-bomb will kill the people, but it won't get the regime targets.

I'd rather hit the regime targets with the B83's, and take the fallout.

Ain't no thang, a little Chernobyl in your coffee, no problemo.
Pre-emptive strike that Orwellian nightmare, before they launch on accident, because their early warning systems suck monkey balls.
They have no early warning at all, don't even need the F-35, their IADS is old and busted Soviet junk.
Okay then, when they do get early warning, it's going to suck monkey balls, so hit them before they get it and launch on false warning.
*yip*

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: North Korea News

Post by Smitty-48 » Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:36 am

Yeah, but, they don't invest in an IADS, because they are under the protection of Mr. Ivan.

And that, is a problemo.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: North Korea News

Post by StCapps » Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:38 am

Smitty-48 wrote:
Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:36 am
Yeah, but, they don't invest in an IADS, because they are under the protection of Mr. Ivan.

And that, is a problemo.
If only the Yanks could get the Russians to turn on them, but easier said than done obviously.
*yip*

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: North Korea News

Post by Smitty-48 » Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:44 am

StCapps wrote:
Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:38 am
Smitty-48 wrote:
Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:36 am
Yeah, but, they don't invest in an IADS, because they are under the protection of Mr. Ivan.

And that, is a problemo.
If only the Yanks could get the Russians to turn on them, but easier said than done obviously.
Oh, Ivan is not turning on his little buddy Kim.

Ivan cannot afford to jettison proxies, because he's not the Soviets anymore, so he doesn't have many left.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: North Korea News

Post by StCapps » Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:45 am

Smitty-48 wrote:
Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:44 am
StCapps wrote:
Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:38 am
Smitty-48 wrote:
Thu Feb 21, 2019 12:36 am
Yeah, but, they don't invest in an IADS, because they are under the protection of Mr. Ivan.

And that, is a problemo.
If only the Yanks could get the Russians to turn on them, but easier said than done obviously.
Oh, Ivan is not turning on his little buddy Kim.

Ivan cannot afford to jettison proxies, because he's not the Soviets, so he doesn't have many left.
I know, I was underexaggerating for effect.
*yip*