Aleppo

User avatar
DrYouth
Posts: 4050
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:13 pm
Location: Canadastan

Re: Aleppo

Post by DrYouth » Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:57 am

Montegriffo wrote:So much more complicated than that. You have rebels and Assad both fighting IS while at the same time fighting each other.
Think China in WWII where both sides of the civil war attacked the Japanese but had no truce between each other.
It's the complication and the lack of a clear enemy/ally distinction which has kept the west out of the conflict so far.
Ok...

So Assad and Russia vs Rebels vs IS

Three way fracas. Russia Assad is winning?

Citizens are losing...
Deep down tho, I still thirst to kill you and eat you. Ultra Chimp can't help it.. - Smitty

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18695
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Aleppo

Post by Montegriffo » Fri Dec 16, 2016 11:59 am

Citizens (or rapefugees as they are known here) always lose. Hard to find a winner in this war.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
BjornP
Posts: 3360
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Aleppo

Post by BjornP » Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:50 pm

DrYouth wrote:What's the deal with Aleppo...

MSM is all excited about it.

What is the real significance of this battle?
Will probably either be, or be capitalized on as, the beginning of the US "losing the Middle East". Bush jr. declared Syria part of the "Axis of Evil" back in his day. Might become part of an axis of neccesary evil under Trump, but recently Turkey and Russia seem to making deals to end fighting without the US even participating, turning the US irrelevant when it comes to Syria. That will probably affect US prestige for some years to come.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Aleppo

Post by clubgop » Fri Dec 16, 2016 6:04 pm

Kazmyr wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:Hamburger Hill with ruined buildings.
Pretty succinct way of putting it.

The only reason I can think of this being a big deal is the "Someone needs to do something about this!" approach. Since the UN is essentially tits on a bull (Aleppo is an alarm bell: the international system has failed), somebody ought to be stepping in.

*nudge nudge*
That and the set up to blame President Trump and let Obama off the hook.

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Aleppo

Post by clubgop » Fri Dec 16, 2016 6:08 pm

DrYouth wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:So much more complicated than that. You have rebels and Assad both fighting IS while at the same time fighting each other.
Think China in WWII where both sides of the civil war attacked the Japanese but had no truce between each other.
It's the complication and the lack of a clear enemy/ally distinction which has kept the west out of the conflict so far.
Ok...

So Assad and Russia vs Rebels vs IS

Three way fracas. Russia Assad is winning?

Citizens are losing...
I remember in the DCF so many posters writing about the demise of the Assad regime. :lol:
They know nothing. :cry:

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Aleppo

Post by Smitty-48 » Fri Dec 16, 2016 6:13 pm

This ain't the A Shau Valley, this is the opposite of that, Dong Ap Bia was a feature which could be dug in on, impervious to firepower, and no way to deploy armour up the hill, with only one landing zone for the American helos to come in on, the Russians don't have these problems in Aleppo.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
DrYouth
Posts: 4050
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:13 pm
Location: Canadastan

Re: Aleppo

Post by DrYouth » Fri Dec 16, 2016 6:13 pm

Image
Deep down tho, I still thirst to kill you and eat you. Ultra Chimp can't help it.. - Smitty

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Aleppo

Post by Okeefenokee » Fri Dec 16, 2016 6:19 pm

Montegriffo wrote:Citizens (or rapefugees as they are known here) always lose. Hard to find a winner in this war.
There are no rapefugees in Aleppo.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Aleppo

Post by Smitty-48 » Fri Dec 16, 2016 6:26 pm

There's a strategic reason why this is not the A Shau as well, at the A Shau, the American chain of command was mindlessly fighting a battle for the "high ground" as if that was the PAVN's centre of gravity in the Central Highlands, when it wasn't, these urban strongholds in Syria however, are in fact the centre of gravity, because there ain't no triple canopy jungle in Syria, and anybody caught in the open, is dead meat.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18695
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Aleppo

Post by Montegriffo » Fri Dec 16, 2016 6:27 pm

Okeefenokee wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:Citizens (or rapefugees as they are known here) always lose. Hard to find a winner in this war.
There are no rapefugees in Aleppo.
There are almost no people left in Aleppo, fled or dead that is what an Aleppo is.
Leave all that tired rapefugee bollocks back in the DCF, this is the new world.
Spouting nonsense about cowards and traitors isn't going to get you un-cucked by your Alt-right buddies.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image