Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Sep 10, 2018 1:18 pm
Dude, don't pretend like it is "dogma". It's a valid argument. If we didn't extend welfare to people with jobs, Walmart would be forced to raise wages. The numbers of working poor are growing because we are stupidly subsidizing the labor forces of bad actors like Walmart. They need to raise wages to where they would otherwise have to pay if nobody could receive assistance for working there. As far as I was aware, they already began this process, seeing the writing on the wall as it is.
Stop providing welfare or any kind of assistance to people with jobs. It's that simple.
I think it’s dogma because it relies on unrelated parables to win over believers. Think of it this way, the question of welfare recipients working at low paying jobs for Walmart/Amazon has nothing to do with the following:
Corporate tax rates
Wealth disparity between CEO and lowest wage earner
Slavery/share cropping/company script (currency)
Robber Barons
Corporate donations to political parties
Cost of raising a family
All of those above topics are separate and unrelated to whether or not Wal-Mart/Amazon are “exploiting” people on welfare. Yet sure as the sun will rise tomorrow, if you press someone to explain why corporations are evil for giving poor people jobs, you’ll get walked through the above topics.
All of those unrelated parables have nothing to do with the actual question. They’re just other stories in the book of leftist political dogma which support the pillar of faith which claims businesses and rich people are evil.
You believe Walmart and Amazon can’t possibly fill the non-skilled jobs up with high schoolers, college kids, and single adults without dependents, but I think they can. You think Walmart and Amazon would tremble at the thought of not being able to hire welfare-subsidized labor, but I think you have it backwards. All the people on welfare fired from their Walmart/Amazon jobs would be begging their legislators to reverse the law, not the corporations.
I agree that forbidding companies from hiring anyone on welfare would settle the issue though. Which is exactly why you’ll never see the politicians pushing the welfare-subsidized worker narrative calling for that to happen. They know the corporations don’t need welfare subsidized workers, and they know the jobs the working poor are doing are unsustainable at higher wages.