clubgop wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 3:46 pmDude,her numbers are worse than Harris. They don’t have anybody. Their best bet would have to be some rando. More people can’t say “eww No.” if their first reaction is “who?”
Also Harris to SCOTUS is some West wing Aaron Sorkin fanfic it ain’t happening. Harris is and was an identity politics landline they set for us to step on, instead they are going to have to set it off or suffer defeat. The question is who is going to make the sacrifice? Who is going to be called a racist, misogynist for life to save the Democrats? No one.
Trump's SCOTUS
-
clubgop
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
-
clubgop
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Dude,
her numbers are worse than Harris. They don’t have anybody. Their best bet would have to be some rando. More people can’t say “eww No.” if their first reaction is “who?”Also Harris to SCOTUS is some West wing Aaron Sorkin fanfic it ain’t happening. Harris is and was an identity politics landmine they set for us to step on, instead they are going to have to set it off or suffer defeat. The question is who is going to make the sacrifice? Who is going to be called a racist, misogynist for life to save the Democrats? No one.
